Estimation of Tsunami Risk for the Bering Coast of Kamchatka


Abstract

 
Until recently, the Bering coast of Kamchatka was not considered as an area
with  a high  level of tsunami risk despite the occurrence of 7.6 magnitude
tsunamigenic earthquake  near  Ozernoy Cape in November of 1969. However, a
series of 6.9-7.1 earthquakes occurred in 1989-1991 in the northern part of
the  Koryak  autonomous  region,  have  risen  the public concern about the
impeding large earthquake in this area. Since a large part of the potential
seismic-prone area is located under the sea bottom, a future earthquake can
generate   a  hazardous  tsunami  with  the destructive effect for numerous
fishing villages  located  on the sand  spits, near the river estuaries and
other low-lying areas.  That is why  the evaluation of tsunami risk for the
Bering  coast  of  Kamchatka  was  an  essential  part  of  the  project on
re-estimation  of  the seismic  hazard for  the Koryak  autonomous  region.
Application  of the  conventional  method  of tsunamizoning,  based  on the
straightforward stochastic evaluation  of historical data,  is not possible
for this area due to nearly the absence of historical tsunami data. In this
study  we  use   the  deterministic   approach  to  this problem,  based on
delineation of potential tsunamigenic zones,assigning the source parameters
for the so-called "design earthquake",  application  of numerical models of
tsunami  generation  and  propagation  in  order  to  obtain  the  computed
mareograms at the important coastal points  and  their  further analysis to
estimate .the possible run-up heights along the coast.

Fig.1. Map of seismicity of north-western Kamchatka for the period from 1912 to 1992. The dotted lines show the position of potentially tsunami-prone zones.

Fig.2. Positions of model earthquake sources for tsunami computation.

Fig.3. Static bottom displacement for source N 1 (see Fig.2). Digits near isolines mean the vertical bottom displacement in cm. The solid dots indicate to the coastal points where computed mareograms were obtained. The inserted figure shows the position of these points on Ilpyrskaya Spit.

Fig.4. Perspective view (from the south-east) of the initial displacement of water surface for model source N1 (above) and the wave field at t=30 min after an earthquake (below).

Fig.5. Computed waveforms for model source N1 (position shown in Fig.2). The horizontal axis shows the time after an earthquake (in hours). The scale of the vertical axis (water level displacement) is shown on the left. Numbers near the computed waveforms correspond to the numbers of coastal points shown in Fig.3.


Conclusion

The main result of our study is the verification of the statement, that a major submarine earthquake with magnitude of the order of 7.6 with the epicenter on the continental slope of the Komandorskiy Basin can produce a real tsunami threat for numerous fishing villages located in the northern part of Karaginskiy Bay. The expected tsunami wave at the nearest parts of the coast may be as high as 4 meters. Various secondary effects (coastal and underwater landslides), the probability of which is rather high in this region, characterized by a low level of background seismicity and by a large recurrence period of major earthquakes, can result in the significant (2-3 times) increase of heights of waves in comparison with those obtained in our calculations.